Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Dennis Novak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Almeida vs Novak analysis and find out who is favored!
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida vs Dennis Novak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Almeida 1 - 0 Novak
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Almeida has won 47.84% of points on his second serve, while Novak has won 49.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Almeida, in recent form, has won 50.72% of his opponent's second serve points, while Novak has won 52.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.14% and 33.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Almeida has saved 62.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Novak has saved 56.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Almeida has won 45.83% of matches played (W/L 22/ 26), with Novak winning 55.22% (W/L 37/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Almeida has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 154/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63).
- Player level: In the last year, Almeida has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 20/ 24), where as Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 30/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Almeida winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Almeida winning 2 and Novak winning 0. The last match between Almeida and Novak was at the Prostejov Challenger, 30-05-2022, First, Clay with Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida getting the victory 7-5 3-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Almeida and Novak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Almeida winning 0 times and Novak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Almeida winning 0, and Novak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Almeida has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.88 while Novak has played against players with an average rank of 314.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Almeida has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Novak has won 37% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Almeida has converted 48.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Novak has converted 40.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
330
Rank
190
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
207
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (176-122)
Career Total W/L
63% (489-293)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$57,890
Career Prize Money
$838,895
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Dennis Novak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 10 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:4 | 1:34:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (47/73) | 56% (28/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (30/47) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 55% (12/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 14% (2/14) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (24/50) | 42% (31/73) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Dennis Novak
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | Dennis Novak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (24/17) | 52% (33/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (207/185) | 51% (288/272) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 53% (9/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 50 | 77 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:4 | 1:24:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.67 | 351.61 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (827/1337) | 66% (1123/1696) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (556/827) | 68% (768/1123) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (244/510) | 50% (284/573) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (59/122) | 41% (79/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (539/1274) | 40% (720/1783) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 50% (13/13) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (10/17) | 50% (13/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 20% (15/3) |
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Liam Draxl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
46 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
41%
(
28 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
73%
(
64 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
52 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andrea Collarini
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Dennis Novak
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alex Michelsen
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Dan Added
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
30
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Dennis Novak
46%
(
41 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Dennis Novak
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Lukas Neumayer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Dennis Novak
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Almeida Vs Novak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
